Showing posts with label Pediatrics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pediatrics. Show all posts
Monday, January 5, 2015
'Small screens' prevent kids from sleeping: study
MIAMI -- Children who have access to tablets or smartphones in their bedrooms get less sleep than children who do not have the devices with them at night, a US study said Monday.
The findings in the January 5 edition of the journal Pediatrics show that having a so-called "small screen" within reach was slightly worse than a television set when it came to sleep deprivation in a group of 2,000 middle school kids.
Overall, those with access to smartphones and tablets got nearly 21 fewer minutes of sleep per night than children whose rooms were free of such technology, and they were more likely to say they felt sleep-deprived.
Those with a TV in the bedroom got 18 minutes fewer of slumber than kids without televisions in their rooms.
"Presence of a small screen, but not a TV, in the sleep environment, and screen time were associated with perceived insufficient rest or sleep," said the study led by Jennifer Falbe of the University of California, Berkeley School of Public Health.
"These findings caution against unrestricted screen access in children's bedrooms."
Participants in the study included 2,048 fourth- and seventh-graders enrolled in the Massachusetts Childhood Obesity Research Demonstration Study from 2012 to 2013.
source: www.abs-cbnnews.com
Wednesday, November 28, 2012
Children with psoriasis may also be obese
Children with the skin disease psoriasis are about twice as likely to be overweight or obese as children who don't have the disease, U.S. researchers said.
Lead author Dr. Amy Paller of Northwestern University's Feinberg School of Medicine and pediatric dermatologist at the Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago said U.S. children with psoriasis have much higher odds than psoriatic children in other countries of being obese or overweight.
The study, published in the Archives of Dermatology, found U.S. children with psoriasis had four times the odds of being overweight or obese as healthy controls.
"Within this U.S. population, Hispanics and African-American children had significantly greater rates of being obese and overweight than whites and Asians," the study authors wrote in the study. "The odds ratio of being obese were particularly high for U.S. children with more severe psoriasis."
source: upi.com
Lead author Dr. Amy Paller of Northwestern University's Feinberg School of Medicine and pediatric dermatologist at the Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago said U.S. children with psoriasis have much higher odds than psoriatic children in other countries of being obese or overweight.
The study, published in the Archives of Dermatology, found U.S. children with psoriasis had four times the odds of being overweight or obese as healthy controls.
"Within this U.S. population, Hispanics and African-American children had significantly greater rates of being obese and overweight than whites and Asians," the study authors wrote in the study. "The odds ratio of being obese were particularly high for U.S. children with more severe psoriasis."
source: upi.com
Children
with the skin disease psoriasis are about twice as likely to be
overweight or obese as children who don't have the disease, U.S.
researchers said.
Lead author Dr. Amy Paller of Northwestern University's Feinberg School of Medicine and pediatric dermatologist at the Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago said U.S. children with psoriasis have much higher odds than psoriatic children in other countries of being obese or overweight.
The study, published in the Archives of Dermatology, found U.S. children with psoriasis had four times the odds of being overweight or obese as healthy controls.
"Within this U.S. population, Hispanics and African-American children had significantly greater rates of being obese and overweight than whites and Asians," the study authors wrote in the study. "The odds ratio of being obese were particularly high for U.S. children with more severe psoriasis."
Read more: http://www.upi.com/Health_News/2012/11/28/Children-with-psoriasis-may-also-be-obese/UPI-12631354085676/#ixzz2DWbNsNIu
Lead author Dr. Amy Paller of Northwestern University's Feinberg School of Medicine and pediatric dermatologist at the Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago said U.S. children with psoriasis have much higher odds than psoriatic children in other countries of being obese or overweight.
The study, published in the Archives of Dermatology, found U.S. children with psoriasis had four times the odds of being overweight or obese as healthy controls.
"Within this U.S. population, Hispanics and African-American children had significantly greater rates of being obese and overweight than whites and Asians," the study authors wrote in the study. "The odds ratio of being obese were particularly high for U.S. children with more severe psoriasis."
Read more: http://www.upi.com/Health_News/2012/11/28/Children-with-psoriasis-may-also-be-obese/UPI-12631354085676/#ixzz2DWbNsNIu
Tuesday, July 3, 2012
Babies who stay longer inside mom's womb are smarter - study
Researchers have known that babies born prematurely are at risk for slowed brain development, but a couple of extra weeks in the womb might make a difference even among those considered "normal term" - between 37 and 41 weeks, according to a U.S. study.
Children born on the shorter end of that range scored lower on math and reading tests as 8-year-olds than those born later, researchers wrote in the journal Pediatrics, but they added that the differences were small.
"Certainly the vast majority of 37-weekers and 41-weekers would end up developing typically," said Kimberly Noble, the lead author on the study from Columbia University Medical Center and New York-Presbyterian Hospital.
Still, until more research is done, she said, "we would urge caution to both parents and physicians when considering early elective delivery."
Noble and her colleagues compared birth records and third-grade standardized test scores for 128,000 children born in New York City in the late 1980s and early 1990s who went to citywide public schools. All of them had been born between 37 and 41 weeks' gestation.
On both reading and math exams, where a score of 50 was considered average, kids born at 41 weeks scored about one point higher, in general, than those born at 37 weeks.
That's equivalent to about a 1.5 point difference on an IQ test, Noble said.
"That would not be a difference that would likely be noticeable from one child to the next," she told Reuters Health. "Where it is more noticeable is on the lower end of the (test score) distribution."
For example, children born at 37 weeks were 23 percent more likely to have at least moderate reading impairment, and 19 percent more likely to have moderate math impairment, than those born on the late end of the term range.
Noble said the finding doesn't prove that being born early-term can slow kids' brain development and hurt their academic achievement, since it's possible that other factors are related both to early births and academic difficulties.
Marie McCormick, a maternal and child health researcher from the Harvard School of Public Health in Boston, agreed that was one limitation of the study.
"Even if it's an early term delivery, there may have been something going on that led to that child being born earlier in the process than later," she said.
Still, the findings are consistent with some previous research suggesting that babies born at 37 or 38 weeks may be different from those born slightly later, she added.
The researchers agreed that although the findings shouldn't be too concerning, they are something to consider for women who have some control over when their babies will be born, such as those scheduling a cesarean section.
"The main thing is ... when you're coming to the discussion about delivery and if you have a decision about the timing of that delivery, to really make sure that you're as far along in pregnancy as you can get without getting out of the range of normal," McCormick said.
source: interaksyon.com
Children born on the shorter end of that range scored lower on math and reading tests as 8-year-olds than those born later, researchers wrote in the journal Pediatrics, but they added that the differences were small.
"Certainly the vast majority of 37-weekers and 41-weekers would end up developing typically," said Kimberly Noble, the lead author on the study from Columbia University Medical Center and New York-Presbyterian Hospital.
Still, until more research is done, she said, "we would urge caution to both parents and physicians when considering early elective delivery."
Noble and her colleagues compared birth records and third-grade standardized test scores for 128,000 children born in New York City in the late 1980s and early 1990s who went to citywide public schools. All of them had been born between 37 and 41 weeks' gestation.
On both reading and math exams, where a score of 50 was considered average, kids born at 41 weeks scored about one point higher, in general, than those born at 37 weeks.
That's equivalent to about a 1.5 point difference on an IQ test, Noble said.
"That would not be a difference that would likely be noticeable from one child to the next," she told Reuters Health. "Where it is more noticeable is on the lower end of the (test score) distribution."
For example, children born at 37 weeks were 23 percent more likely to have at least moderate reading impairment, and 19 percent more likely to have moderate math impairment, than those born on the late end of the term range.
Noble said the finding doesn't prove that being born early-term can slow kids' brain development and hurt their academic achievement, since it's possible that other factors are related both to early births and academic difficulties.
Marie McCormick, a maternal and child health researcher from the Harvard School of Public Health in Boston, agreed that was one limitation of the study.
"Even if it's an early term delivery, there may have been something going on that led to that child being born earlier in the process than later," she said.
Still, the findings are consistent with some previous research suggesting that babies born at 37 or 38 weeks may be different from those born slightly later, she added.
The researchers agreed that although the findings shouldn't be too concerning, they are something to consider for women who have some control over when their babies will be born, such as those scheduling a cesarean section.
"The main thing is ... when you're coming to the discussion about delivery and if you have a decision about the timing of that delivery, to really make sure that you're as far along in pregnancy as you can get without getting out of the range of normal," McCormick said.
source: interaksyon.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
