Showing posts with label Millionaires. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Millionaires. Show all posts
Wednesday, April 10, 2013
Obama budget targets millionaires
WASHINGTON - The White House on Wednesday proposed a budget that would sharply trim the U.S. deficit over three years by forcing millionaires to pay more in taxes and enacting spending cuts that replace the "sequester" reductions that went into place last month.
President Barack Obama's fiscal 2014 budget blueprint ensures that those making $1 million a year or more would have to pay at least 30 percent of their income in taxes, after gifts to charity, officials said.
That increase, along with spending cuts and a 28 percent cap on tax deductions for high earners, would bring the U.S. budget deficit down to 2.8 percent of GDP by 2016 and 1.7 percent by 2023, senior administration officials told reporters. The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office in February projected the U.S. deficit to be 5.3 percent of GDP this year.
Obama is due to release his full budget at 11:15 a.m. EDT (1515 GMT) and to make remarks at that time.
The president's budget stands little chance of being enacted into law and is meant to serve largely as a negotiating tool with Republicans in Congress, who have outlined budget proposals of their own.
Senior administration officials said that, in spite of Republican leaders' resistance to tax increases, they hoped Obama's plan could lead to a deficit reduction accord.
"There continue to be people who are on the Republican side ... in the Senate at least, who are saying things that would give you some hope that there is a path to a deal," a senior administration official told reporters.
The president's advisers said the budget proposal would achieve $1.8 trillion in deficit reduction over 10 years. Added to the $2.5 trillion in deficit cuts from past efforts, the total would be above the $4 trillion reduction both Republicans and the White House have said would be an acceptable goal.
Republicans quickly dismissed Obama's proposal, particularly his deficit reduction plans, which they described as not serious.
"When you cut through the spin and get to the facts, it looks like there's less than $600 billion worth of (deficit) reduction in there - and that's over a decade - all of it coming from tax increases," said Don Stewart, a spokesman for Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell.
"In other words, it's not a serious plan. For the most part, just another left-wing wish list," he said.
Looking for a deal
The president is breaking from the tradition of using the largely symbolic budget release to outline his ideal tax and spending proposals. Instead, he is trying to relaunch talks to resolve a long-running fiscal battle with his Capitol Hill adversaries.
To do so, Obama is offering a concession that has enraged many of his supporters: adopting a less generous measure of inflation to calculate cost-of-living increases for the beneficiaries of many federal programs. One result would be diminished benefits for most recipients of the popular Social Security retirement program.
Although Obama has pledged to shield some of the most vulnerable beneficiaries, the proposal has drawn strong opposition from Democrats and groups representing labor and the elderly.
At the same time, his budget proposal faces seemingly insurmountable opposition from Republican leaders, who reject any new tax revenues.
Obama's hope is to build a coalition of lawmakers willing to compromise, although most observers see that as unlikely. He has invited 12 Republicans to dinner at the White House on Wednesday in an effort to soften resistance.
"The question is, are Republicans going to be willing to come to us to do the serious thing that they say is so important in terms of reducing our deficit," a senior administration official said in a conference call with reporters the day before the budget release.
Both sides are so dug in that they were unable to prevent some $85 billion in across-the-board "sequestration cuts" from going into effect March 1.
Obama's budget proposal would replace those cuts with his original deficit reduction proposal from December. That offer included $930 billion in spending reductions and some $580 billion in tax revenues.
The president's budget includes spending on policy priorities such as infrastructure and early childhood education. He would pay for those programs with additional taxes and the elimination of some tax breaks for the well-off.
The budget also includes a 10 percent tax credit for small businesses that raise wages or hire new workers.
Obama's budget is a clear contrast with a rival blueprint put forward by Representative Paul Ryan, the 2012 Republican vice presidential nominee and potential 2016 presidential candidate.
"You can invest in the middle class, create jobs, and reduce our deficits," a senior administration official said. "We don't have to choose between deficits as far as the eye can see and the sort of austerity that's in the Paul Ryan budget."
Ryan's bill aims to balance the budget in 10 years through deep cuts to healthcare and social programs while lowering tax rates.
source: abs-cbnnews.com
Thursday, February 2, 2012
Silicon Valley braces for Facebook millionaires

SAN FRANCISCO — As Facebook goes public, Silicon Valley is buzzing in anticipation of the “instant millionaires” that may soon be looking for ways to spend their newfound wealth.
Eight years after Mark Zuckerberg founded the company in a Harvard dorm room, the stock market debut is expected to value the social media giant at as much as $100 billion.
While Zuckerberg and other longtime staffers stand to benefit the most, the initial public offering on Wednesday could also make millionaires out of much of the company’s rank-and-file.
Local real estate agents say they expect the IPO — at $5 billion easily the largest ever by a technology company — to boost already high home prices as newly wealthy staffers at the social media giant begin shopping.
“It’s going to have a great effect,” said Pierre Buljan, a Silicon Valley real estate agent who shows homes to young technology executives. “I believe with 1,000 new millionaires, they’re going to need a place to live.”
Buljan said his typical client often seeks “modern, high-tech structures” close to the airport and good schools.
“They don’t like the stuff their parents used to live in,” he said.
Typically clients pay cash for the homes, he said, which can range anywhere from 4,000 to 15,000 square feet (372 to 1,393 square meters) depending on the size of the family.
Real estate agent Dawn Thomas said she is already seeing home prices rise in areas surrounding Facebook’s Menlo Park headquarters and expects that to continue.
“You’re going to have all these instant millionaires on the streets,” Thomas said. “The trickle is already happening.”
Thomas described her tech-savvy homebuyers as “very, very green-minded” and in search of smaller, tech-equipped, energy-efficient homes with high-end amenities.
“They don’t want ‘McMansions,’” she said, referring to super-sized houses that can gobble up energy.
Thomas and Buljan both cautioned that it will take time to see the full effect of the IPO. Facebook shares will not actually begin trading on Wall Street until later this year.
The social networking company may also be taking steps to avoid sparking a buying craze that could spark another housing bubble.
Buljan said he’s heard Facebook has cautioned its soon-to-be millionaires to take their time when purchasing a home in order to avoid staffers flooding the market and essentially bidding against each other.
“They’re very young, 20s and 30s, and the fact is they’re getting some good warnings from inside company execs,” Buljan said. “They don’t want it to be about Facebook has got all these crazy people out there shopping.”
That’s good advice, according to Sam Hamadeh, chief executive of the financial research company PrivCo.
Hamadeh said employees can typically start selling their shares 180 days after a company goes public.
But he said he would advise staffers to resist the temptation to borrow heavily against vested holdings or cash in immediately once those six months are up.
With past IPOs, “a lot of people have gotten devastated by putting down big downpayments on homes” that they later couldn’t afford when share prices dropped, Hamadeh said.
Instead, he said shareholders should sell slowly and not expect prices to soar indefinitely.
“When they can start selling, everyone can start selling,” Hamadeh said. “Between the IPO and six months, you’d be surprised how fast shares can tank sometimes.”
source: interaksyon.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
